← Work psychology

Autonomy · competence · relatedness

Self-determination theory

Support the quality of motivation by making room for agency, mastery and connection.

Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan · 1985 onward · Original editorial explanation
Self-determination theory — simplified model sketchAutonomy · Competence · Relatedness. Editorial interpretation, after Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan (1985 onward).Autonomy+Competence+RelatednessConditions work togetherADM HR · ORIGINAL INTERPRETATIONEdward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan · 1985 onward
Original simplified sketch after Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan (1985 onward). Read the explanation for assumptions and limitations. Download SVG ↗

The core idea

Self-determination theory examines the quality as well as the quantity of motivation. Autonomy concerns acting with a sense of volition; competence concerns effectiveness; relatedness concerns connection with others. Autonomy is not the same as independence or an absence of boundaries. External goals can become personally endorsed, while apparently voluntary activity can still feel pressured. Work design and management behaviour can support or frustrate these needs.

Source and attribution [1]

Using it in practice

Explain the reason for necessary constraints and offer meaningful choices within them. Give feedback that helps people improve rather than merely judging them. Provide access to colleagues and a route to ask for help. Ask what employees experience: a manager’s intention to empower does not prove autonomy exists. Combine flexibility with clear expectations so people are not left guessing about acceptable decisions.

An example, not a reported case

Worked example · illustrative

A contact centre must meet regulatory standards. It keeps mandatory checks but allows advisers to choose how to structure the rest of a call. Coaching uses examples and practice rather than public rankings. New starters have a named peer and protected questions time. The pilot tracks service quality, employee confidence and whether advisers actually experience discretion, rather than assuming fewer scripts automatically means more autonomy.

What to watch for

The theory is not a three-item wellbeing checklist or a promise that every reward harms motivation. Effects depend on how practices are experienced.

Take it into your next conversation

Three useful questions.

  1. Where is there meaningful choice?
  2. What feedback builds capability?
  3. Can people ask for help without losing status?

Related terms

Go to the evidence

Sources & attribution

[1] Deci & Ryan. Self-Determination Theory: about the theory. ↗

The core idea is an original summary of the cited work. Application notes, examples and sketches are our interpretations, not quotations or reproductions of the authors’ figures. Publisher records may require access to read the full original work.

Published 2026-09-20 · Reviewed 2026-09-20. Editorial approach

Keep exploring

A little more context.

A historical lens on needs01

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

A useful prompt for looking beyond pay—but not a universal staircase every employee must climb.

Abraham H. Maslow2 min
Conditions & the work itself02

Herzberg’s two-factor theory

Separate preventable dissatisfaction from the features of work that can create meaning, achievement and growth.

Frederick Herzberg, Bernard Mausner2 min
Effort → performance → outcomes03

Vroom’s expectancy theory

People need to believe that effort can work, performance will lead somewhere, and the outcome matters.

Victor H. Vroom2 min