← Workplace culture

Culture · diagnosis & change

Johnson and Scholes’ Cultural Web

Trace the stories, routines, symbols and systems that keep an organisation’s assumptions in place.

Gerry Johnson & Kevan Scholes · 1992 · Exploring Corporate Strategy · Original editorial explanation
Johnson and Scholes’ Cultural Web — simplified model sketchStories · Symbols · Rituals & routines · Power structures · Organisational structures · Control systems. Editorial interpretation, after Gerry Johnson & Kevan Scholes (1992 · Exploring Corporate Strategy).StoriesSymbolsRituals &routinesPowerstructuresOrganisationalstructuresControlsystemsParadigmADM HR · ORIGINAL INTERPRETATIONGerry Johnson & Kevan Scholes · 1992 · Exploring Corporate Strategy
Original simplified sketch after Gerry Johnson & Kevan Scholes (1992 · Exploring Corporate Strategy). Read the explanation for assumptions and limitations. Download SVG ↗

The core idea

The Cultural Web places a central paradigm—the assumptions shaping what feels normal—among six connected elements: stories, symbols, rituals and routines, power structures, organisational structures and control systems. It is associated with Johnson and Scholes and later editions of Exploring Strategy with Richard Whittington. The model helps connect a general statement about culture to observable features of organisational life. Its centre is an interpretation to investigate, not a slogan to invent and impose.

Source and attribution [1]

Using it in practice

Choose one issue and gather examples for each element. Distinguish the formal organisation chart from informal influence, and stated priorities from measures that actually affect decisions. Build a current map before describing a desired one. Then identify a small set of mutually reinforcing changes, with owners and review dates. Keep contrary evidence and disagreement on the map: the purpose is to understand patterns, not to manufacture consensus in a workshop.

An example, not a reported case

Worked example · illustrative

A fictional security business celebrates the supervisor who personally rescues a failed shift. Overtime totals are highly visible, while avoided disruption is almost invisible. Experienced schedulers influence decisions despite limited formal authority. HR explores a possible paradigm that dependable service requires constant heroics. A pilot recognises early planning, adds a short capacity review and gives schedulers an explicit escalation route. The evaluation checks whether disruption falls without encouraging teams to conceal uncovered work.

What to watch for

A completed diagram is not proof of a causal explanation. Maps may reflect the people invited and the stories they feel safe telling. Do not confuse a power structure with a list of senior job titles, or symbols with branding alone. Changing a symbol while retaining contradictory incentives may change little. Use the web with observation, operational evidence and follow-up conversations.

Stories and symbols

Ask which incidents are repeatedly retold and who appears as the hero, problem-solver or cautionary example. Inspect visible signals of status and access as well as logos and office space. Our working question is what a new starter would learn about whose work matters. Capture more than the senior team’s preferred story.

Rituals and routines

Observe a handover, meeting or promotion discussion. What happens every time, what gets skipped under pressure and what behaviour attracts approval? Choose one routine that can be changed without disrupting essential operations. State the intended behaviour in practical terms, then observe whether the change survives a busy period.

Formal structure and real influence

Draw decision routes as people experience them. Identify where advice is routinely sought and where an informal objection can stop progress. Compare that with official responsibility. Our suggested intervention is to clarify a specific decision and escalation path, rather than assuming a new chart will change influence by itself.

Control systems

Inspect the measures, budget rules, rewards and sanctions that shape choices. Ask which important outcomes are absent from the scorecard. A measure of speed may need a quality check; a cost measure may need visibility of work shifted elsewhere. Make the trade-off explicit and review possible unintended effects before expanding a new measure.

From current web to change plan

For every proposed change, record the supporting element and any contradiction elsewhere in the web. If leaders ask for early reporting but still punish every inconvenient report, address that conflict first. Set a review date and specify observable evidence. Treat the map as a living hypothesis rather than a finished poster.

Take it into your next conversation

Three useful questions.

  1. What observable evidence supports this interpretation?
  2. Whose experience differs from the dominant story?
  3. What small change could we test, and how would we know it helped?

Related terms

Go to the evidence

Sources & attribution

[1] Cultural Web teaching resource, citing Johnson, Scholes and Whittington, Exploring Strategy ↗

The core idea is an original summary of the cited work. Application notes, examples and sketches are our interpretations, not quotations or reproductions of the authors’ figures. Publisher records may require access to read the full original work.

Compare all eight culture models → · Read the practical playbook →

Published 2026-09-20 · Reviewed 2026-09-20. Editorial approach

Keep exploring

A little more context.

Culture · diagnosis & change01

Schein’s three levels of culture

Move from visible routines to the beliefs beneath them, and investigate why stated values and daily decisions can diverge.

Edgar H. Schein4 min
Culture · diagnosis & change02

Deal and Kennedy’s culture model

Explore how the stakes of decisions and the speed of learning about their outcomes shape working habits.

Terrence E. Deal4 min
Culture · diagnosis & change03

Handy’s four organisational cultures

Understand where authority comes from: personal influence, defined roles, specialist expertise or professional autonomy.

Charles Handy4 min