← HR strategy

Capabilities that last

The resource-based view

Look beyond headcount to the knowledge, relationships and routines that enable an organisation to do something distinctive.

Jay B. Barney · 1991 · Original editorial explanation
The resource-based view — simplified model sketchValuable · Rare · Hard to imitate · Non-substitutable. Editorial interpretation, after Jay B. Barney (1991).ValuableRareHard to imitateNon-substitutableADM HR · ORIGINAL INTERPRETATIONJay B. Barney · 1991
Original simplified sketch after Jay B. Barney (1991). Read the explanation for assumptions and limitations. Download SVG ↗

The core idea

Barney’s 1991 resource-based argument links sustained competitive advantage to heterogeneous resources that competitors cannot easily reproduce or replace. Its familiar criteria are value, rarity, imperfect imitability and non-substitutability: VRIN. Later VRIO formulations add organisation as an explicit question, but should not be presented as the identical 1991 framework. HR applications often focus on collective knowledge, coordination and relationships rather than an isolated “star” employee.

Source and attribution [1]

Using it in practice

Describe a capability as something the organisation can reliably do. Identify the people, tools, routines and relationships supporting it. Ask what a competitor could buy tomorrow and what would require years of shared learning. Then assess fragility: a supposedly distinctive capability held by one exhausted specialist may be a continuity risk. Development, knowledge sharing and fair retention practices can be more useful than simply paying for scarce credentials.

An example, not a reported case

Worked example · illustrative

A small engineering firm resolves unusual installation problems quickly. Its advantage is not just certification: technicians trust one another, share failure histories and know which design specialist to call. HR builds mentoring time and succession cover into the operating plan. It evaluates whether new technicians can solve unfamiliar cases with support, rather than counting course attendance as the capability itself.

What to watch for

Value is contextual and can disappear as customer needs change. A valuable workforce should not be treated merely as property: employees have agency, rights and options.

Take it into your next conversation

Three useful questions.

  1. What can we do reliably that matters to customers?
  2. How is that capability reproduced?
  3. Where is the single point of failure?

Related terms

Go to the evidence

Sources & attribution

[1] Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. ↗

The core idea is an original summary of the cited work. Application notes, examples and sketches are our interpretations, not quotations or reproductions of the authors’ figures. Publisher records may require access to read the full original work.

Published 2026-09-20 · Reviewed 2026-09-20. Editorial approach

Keep exploring

A little more context.

People analytics · models & decisions01

The HR value chain & causal chain

Connect HR investment with employee, operational and business outcomes—and test the links.

David E. Guest3 min
AMO framework02

Ability, motivation and opportunity

A performance problem may be about capability, willingness, or the chance to contribute. Diagnose before prescribing.

Thomas Bailey2 min
There is no single best way03

Contingency theory & strategic fit

Choose HR practices that fit the work and its context, while keeping legal and ethical standards consistent.

Paul R. Lawrence2 min